Thursday, July 02, 2009

Grumpy Old Authors

Apparently some authors feel it is their publisher’s duty to publish them. And when something happens they don’t like, though the fault may lie with them, they decide to criticize and denigrate that publisher in public forums and expect this passive aggressive ploy to endear them to that publisher and therefore get them their way.

It’s a risky tactic unless you are somebody like Stephen King or Stephanie Meyer. And it makes said author look like a bitter sniveling curmudgeon. Publishing, like writing, is a business. The publisher, through their own marketing research, knows what it wants and doesn’t want. It may have limitations placed on its material by outside elements the author has no knowledge of. You don’t get a job at McDonalds and start telling them how to make their fries. So if you are going to push the limits you had better decide to be sincere and do it for the sake of your art, and not simply for the sake of pushing to see what you can get away with. And you should be prepared to tone down that effort if it doesn’t fly.

Of course, I am not saying you shouldn’t express your displeasure in a polite courteous manner befitting the professional you are. You have that right and publishers respect that. But keep biting the hand that prints you and sooner or later you’re going to pull back a stump—read: rejection, or blackballing.

Besides being a business for both publisher and author, being published is a privilege. I am totally against the PC pervasiveness, but on the other hand I understand it’s there and if you are going to write you will need to come to terms with it and work around it. Constantly whining about it does not do a damn bit of good for any concerned. An artist should be able to work within the boundaries set forth by the publisher—and ALL publishers have them—and still be able to satisfy their creative integrity. If your publisher frowns on violence or sex, then work harder on character and suspense. If you can’t live with the guidelines, go elsewhere.

I’ve been very lucky with my publishers. I have probably used some things in books that might not fly from others because, I hope, I have used them in such a way as to still be palatable and true for the reader. There have been times when I pushed the limit--though I have never down this on purpose, it was just the story I was telling--and maybe went too far. Sometimes I probably haven’t gone far enough. That’s part of being an author. That’s part of being a professional, as I discussed in a previous blog.

Some folks never learn that. They feel every word they set down is sacrosanct, and bitch and moan about their artistic integrity if even a single phrase is altered, when in actuality all it comes down to is pathological need for control and validation. They crave being right. They are essentially two-years-olds stomping their feet and wanting their way or no way.

Believe me, take this attitude enough and it is usually no way.

Then of course, after the inevitable confrontation, they feel the need to argue their point incessantly and ad infinitum. They take it public. Perhaps there are instances in which this is necessary, such as if you are being radioactively poisoned by Russian spies, but for the most part this just burns bridges and makes the complainer look like an ass. I know authors like that. They usually pick and choose supportive statements from friends out of context to back up their case. I’ve been the victim of it and so have some friends and publishers.

This negative energy usually turns on the user, much like the Wiccan tenant of what you do unto others coming back on you seven times over(forgive me if I balled that up any, I’m going from memory). I wish these authors would seriously sit down and take a hard look at themselves. See the other point of view and perhaps learn to channel their energy into a more positive creative expression. There are points of no return. A little revising might get you published, but a lot of whining isn’t going to endear you to anyone, including the folks who initially supported you. Hard lesson learned for those types. Too often a bitter pill that just swells in their gullet. A pity. Because talent is a gift. Irritating the hell out of someone is not…

4 comments:

I.J. Parnham said...

Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence. As far as possible without surrender be on good terms with all persons. Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even the dull and the ignorant; they too have their story.

Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit. If you compare yourself with others, you may become vain and bitter; for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.

Keep interested in your own career, however humble; it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time. Exercise caution in your business affairs; for the world is full of trickery. But let this not blind you to what virtue there is; many persons strive for high ideals; and everywhere life is full of heroism.

Be yourself. Especially, do not feign affection. Neither be cynical about love; for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment it is as perennial as the grass.

Take kindly the counsel of the years, gracefully surrendering the things of youth. Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune. But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings. Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness. Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself.

You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be cheerful. Strive to be happy.

Max Ehrmann, Desiderata, Copyright 1952.

Nancy J. Parra said...

Hi Howard- great post- and so true!

Happy Fourth of July!

Ray said...

Bear with me on this.
I've always tried to be on the up side of things. So I will take you into the downside.
And leaving westerns to one side.
When I wasn't reading westerns or war books - then it was the likes of Erskine Caldwell, Jack Kerouac, J.D.Salinger, Alan Sillitoe, Colin Wilson - people who wrote about life that I could recognise.
So when I pick up a book that says that it is an authentic re-creation of the sixties and reads like it was set more in modern Britain I feel a bit cheated.
Taking things to an extreme John Grisham wrote a book (the title escapes me) but the film had Sandra Bullock, Samuel L. Jackson and Kevin Spacey in it. But I have not come across its equivelent by a British author.
As you say a publisher knows what the acceptable limits are.
Maybe, I'm just stuck in my own past and the world has moved on. But do I have to accept that?
Westerns though are a different story - that is something that I can live with.

ARCHAVIST said...

It's a two way street - the author more and more these days has to push his own product to stand out in a very aggressive marketplace. Though never bite the hand that feeds you.